Recently I made a post on someone’s blog about a radio interview Cimino did with the host. I made comments that I disagreed, or at least questioned, some of the things he was saying. One of the parties I mentioned in my comments was the Jesuits, who Cimino seems to nearly deny any wrongdoing by. In any event, he launched into a vitriolic rant in which he made one patently false statement after another about me.
First off, he said
that I made the comment that the host was the only one who made sane statements
and that was not what I said, but was taking issue with some of the things he
seemed to be going off the rails on.
Second, he makes the
comment that I tried to derail the comment section—another totally false
accusation and at that point I had only made one comment, while a number of
others had made multiple posts that I didn’t even reply to. Then he goes one
better and defends someone for her racist comments. For the record, I’m not
Jewish or God forbid Zionist, which are other patently false claims he's made about me.
Third, I did not say I
“liked” certain parts of the show, as though I were giving a purely emotional
reaction to it, which obviously was his response to my post. I said I agreed with some of
what he said and thought he made blanket extrapolations on other things.
Then he makes the
comment that he has the prerogative to be able to ask the host to have comments
removed! It’s not even his blog! He overturns one statement with another when a
poster says he wants censorship of posts and Cimino says that’s not going to
happen. Well, if Cimino's directing the host to remove comments, that’s censorship
okay. To further that point, he goes on to tell the commenters not to make
posts about Jesuits in a comment that demonstrates not only bad English but his
unrealistic rage.
Apparently, if one
makes a comment about Jesuits, Cimino considers them to be “closeted Zionists.”
Then he goes on to
tell everyone they should “have at it,” but once again gives his directive to
not speak about the Jesuits.
His next comment is
that if you only “like” part of what he says and say that, you are considered
by him to be a “saboteur.”
He ends his
tyrannical rant with yet another order that he will have comments removed per
his directive to the host of the blog if he doesn’t like them. Amazing!
Well, suffice it to
say that this pathological liar has had his credibility dumped in the toilet
for me. He’s a raving lunatic whose comments should definitely be held with
suspicion; he’s obviously capable of lying with impunity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought police-a group of people with totalitarian views on a given subject, who constantly monitor others for any deviation from prescribed thinkingParanoia-a mental disorder characterized by systematized delusions and the projection of personal conflicts, which are ascribed to the supposed hostility of others, sometimes progressing to disturbances of consciousness and aggressive acts believed to be performed in self-defense or as a mission.
Source: Dictionary.com
It's interesting to observe the human mind that says openly you can debate and comment, but on my watch, you can't talk about certain things, and by God if you do, I'll label you. This is not only double standard, but totally devoid of integrity.
