Friday, July 13, 2012

LIghtworkers and the Theme of Persistence

 

"It is the secret of the world that all things subsist and do not die, but only retire a little from sight and afterwards return again. Nothing is dead; men feign themselves dead, and endure mock funerals… and there they stand looking out of the window, sound and well, in some strange new disguise." --Ralph Waldo Emerson

I once woke from a dream in which Emerson was leaning over me and talking to me. Alas, I don't remember his words, but it was wonderful to have such a bright soul visit me in a dream. He and the many lightworkers he lived among helped spread light in a multitude of ways in a seeming soul group that had chosen to incarnate as writers. It seems at times as though that light will be put out, but I don't think so...there's too many lightworkers here...


This is a great post by Kerry Cassidy regarding the funding of black projects...

TRADING PROGRAMS : FUNDING BLACK PROJECTS

When she mentioned humanitarian programs, it made me think of a Graham Hancock interview in which Graham mentioned that he kept seeing this sort of thing where funds supposedly were going to a charity to help in some country foreign to the donors but were actually going to the menace that was destroying the landscape and the livelihood of the people there. He decided to write a book about it. That was published in the 90s. 

So, it's been going on for some time. Then when you consider that money is getting funneled through the IRS to the Federal Reserve who are in turn funding God knows anything from unnecessary wars to private entities that help maintain their existence, you begin to get a grasp of how the common person is funding the end of their country and their life as they know/knew it. Beyond this, we have the seemingly bottomless piggybank in the form of the printing press.

At first blush, it would seem that the cabal is merely funding their own destruction, but if one looks into the future though the gaze of excellent remote viewers, one sees this, but not necessarily in the context of which we, the majority, might prefer. For instance, it is said there will be a redefining of credit laws and of what the creditor can recoup from the individual. That mortgages will be considerably different from what they are now. As in there will be a small monthly mortgage that nearly anyone will be able to afford but the mortgage will basically last for the time at which the family occupies the house. Also, there is supposed to only be about 4 major banks and credit unions will be their major competition. 

So, how will these changes come about? I would say by an informed people willing to make change, but unfortunately having to work within a certain infrastructure that continues to allow usury to define some aspects of our lives. Of course, what one remote viewer sees doesn't necessarily have to come true in full measure and in any event, I think we continue to define ourselves with knowledge--knowledge I never had access to as readily as kids growing up now. 

One of the biggest things that brings about change in a society and needs to define our youth, and something I would say the Greeks knew very well is the ability to reason and to question. It is indeed what defines the individualist who rallies against the system--a system that tests the will and defies the direction of the individualist and a system that will ultimately fail as the human race, through great pain and toil defies and recreates the system--into one that works.

Individualists, like those listed below, continue to provide light to a society in sore need of it, and those who catch this light and take up the banner will in turn spread this out to a growing awareness. And as this light goes out, its interception will be sought by those who attempt to refract and channel it, and do so once again for their own ends. But how long can a dark influence sustain itself before the light takes hold and the catalyst moves the other way?

 5

Frank Abignale 

Brooks Agnew

Joe Bannister

Tony Cartalucci

Kerry Cassidy

Amelia Earhart

Einstein

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Emiel

Nigel Farage

Margaret Fuller

Gandhi 

Edward Griffin

Graham Hancock

Dr. Michael Hudson

Jesus

Neil Keenan

Bobby Kennedy

John Kennedy

Stephen Lendmen

Jim Marrs 

Cynthia McKinney  

Ralph Nader

Ron Paul 

Aaron Russo

Keith Scott 

Serpico

Gerry Spence 

Fritz Springmeyer 

Cliff Stone

Dr. Webster Tarpley

Tesla

Henry David Thoreau 

Jim Traficant

Paul Wellstone

David Wilcock

...the guy or gal you know who just won't
accept the one size fits all concept or...
is that you?